Legal Opinion

Aronson v. Levison

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1905No. S.F. No. 4374PublishedCited by 2 opinions

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a portion of a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Edward Mills Adams, and Charles W. Slack, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal. The appellant, plaintiff in the court below, brought an action to quiet title as to certain real estate in the city and county of San Francisco, and among the defendants in said action was Robert John Levison, a minor. On the application of the plaintiff in the court below to have a guardian ad litem appointed for said minor defendant, the court appointed George B. Merrill, an attorney in said city and county, as such guardian ad litem. After the hearing of the cause in the court below, before rendition of judgment, said Merrill, as guardian ad litem,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fairbanks v. LampkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Harron v. HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Smith v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Langan v. LanganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Reinertsen v. Idaho Power & Concentrating Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API