Sellick v. De Carlow
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Lassen County denying a motion to strike out a cost bill. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an appeal from an order made after final judgment, denying defendants’ motion to strike out plaintiff’s cost bill and its amount froi/n the judgment. The action was for an injunction restraining defendants from diverting certain water, and for damages. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, restraining defendants as prayed for, and for twenty dollars damages. The decision—that is, the findings — and the judgment were filed and entered March 20, 1891; and the cost bill in question was filed March 16th, —four days before the decision. Section 1033 of the Code of *645Civil Procedure provides…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dashiell v. SlingerlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Solomon v. ReeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Oullahan v. MorrisseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Langan v. LanganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
- McDonnell v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- Southern California Railway Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Fairbanks v. LampkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hotchkiss v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.