Legal Opinion

Southeast Ceramics, Inc v. Klem

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1980No. 58535PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Appellee Klem brought an action for breach of contract. Appellant Southeast Ceramics counterclaimed, alleging malicious use of process. The trial court granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment on appellant’s counterclaim. The court denied appellant’s motion for summary judgment on appellee’s claim. We affirm the grant of appellee’s motion and dismiss that part of the appeal relating to the denial of appellant’s motion for summary judgment.

1. Appellant claims it was error for the trial court to grant the motion for summary judgment against its counterclaim alleging malicious…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Jacksonville Paper Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF DOUGLAS v. Marbut Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. Slay v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Johnson v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southeast Ceramics, Inc. v. KlemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Southeast Ceramics, Inc. v. KlemCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Glucklin v. Ross (In re Specialty Products, Inc.)District Court, D. Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API