Slay v. Brady
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Presiding Judge.
1. Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal is directed to the order directing a verdict and to the overruling of a motion for new trial, and the enumeration of errors is only as to the direction of the verdict.
It is urged that the direction of the verdict is not an appealable judgment (Hurst v. Starr, 226 Ga. 42 (172 SE2d 604); Allen v. Reynolds & Co., 123 Ga. App. 604 (181 SE2d 927)), and thus this portion of the notice of appeal should be disregarded. And further, that since there is no enumeration of error as to the overruling…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hill v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Hurst v. StarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- State Highway Department v. HilliardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Dowling v. TracyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Allen v. Reynolds & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
3Cited by9 opinions
- Contractors Management Corp. v. McDowell-Kelley, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Checker Cab Co. v. FedorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Echols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Williams v. First Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Gold Kist, Inc. v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.