Legal Opinion

Kingston v. Helm

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided September 5, 2002No. 13-00-327-CVPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice DORSEY.

The issue in this case is whether John F. Helm may be held individually hable for conduct he undertook while acting as a representative for Greenway Development, Inc. We hold that the trial court erred by holding that Helm may not be held so liable. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Artie Kingston sued John F. Helm for fraud, DTPA, and neghgent misrepresentation stemming from a transaction wherein Kingston purchased a town home unit from Greenway Development, Inc.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Leitch v. HornsbyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Leyendecker & Associates, Inc. v. WechterTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. ACS Investors, Inc. v. McLaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Wooley v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  2. Shandong Yinguang Chemical Industries Joint Stock Co. v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. Walker v. Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  4. Sanchez v. Mulvaney, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
  5. Bates Energy Oil & Gas v. Complete Oilfield Servs.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2019

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API