Fein v. Public Service Coordinated Transport
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The defendant in a personal injury action has moved, under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), to transfer the case to the District of New Jersey. The only reason alleged for the transfer is to enable the defendant to join as third party defendant a person who can be reached by process in New Jersey but not in Pennsylvania. I think it is a sufficient reason.
The plaintiff has cited a number of cases in which somewhat similar applications for transfer were denied. In each of them, although the matter of bringing in a third party defendant was one of the factors, the question of the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Meterlogic, Inc. v. Copier Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- Leinberger v. WebsterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
- New York Central Railroad Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Deepwater Exploration Co. v. Andrew Weir InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1958
- Bartolacci v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day SaintsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.