Legal Opinion

Fein v. Public Service Coordinated Transport

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 31, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 23658PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

The defendant in a personal injury action has moved, under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), to transfer the case to the District of New Jersey. The only reason alleged for the transfer is to enable the defendant to join as third party defendant a person who can be reached by process in New Jersey but not in Pennsylvania. I think it is a sufficient reason.

The plaintiff has cited a number of cases in which somewhat similar applications for transfer were denied. In each of them, although the matter of bringing in a third party defendant was one of the factors, the question of the…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Meterlogic, Inc. v. Copier Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
  2. Leinberger v. WebsterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
  3. New York Central Railroad Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Deepwater Exploration Co. v. Andrew Weir InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1958
  5. Bartolacci v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day SaintsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API