Legal Opinion

Lujan v. Navistar, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2018No. 16-0588PublishedCited by 272 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blacklock

In this commercial dispute, the trial court granted partial summary judgment based on the so-called "sham affidavit rule." Under the rule, if a party submits an affidavit that conflicts with the affiant's prior sworn testimony and does not provide a sufficient explanation for the conflict, a trial court may disregard the affidavit when deciding whether the party has raised a genuine fact issue to avoid summary judgment. Most Texas courts of appeals have recognized the sham affidavit rule as a legitimate component of a trial judge's authority under Rule 166a to grant summary judgment when no…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by272 opinions

  1. Mark Silguero and Amy Wolfe v. Csl Plasma, IncorporatedTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Maldonado v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  3. Brown v. ArensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  4. Kilgore Independent School District v. Darlene Axberg, John Claude Axberg, Sheila Anderson, and the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2019
  5. AEP Texas Inc. v. Wilks Ranch Texas, LTD; Daniel H. Wilks; Staci Wilks; And Farjo Ranch LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2025

267 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API