Lujan v. Navistar, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blacklock
In this commercial dispute, the trial court granted partial summary judgment based on the so-called "sham affidavit rule." Under the rule, if a party submits an affidavit that conflicts with the affiant's prior sworn testimony and does not provide a sufficient explanation for the conflict, a trial court may disregard the affidavit when deciding whether the party has raised a genuine fact issue to avoid summary judgment. Most Texas courts of appeals have recognized the sham affidavit rule as a legitimate component of a trial judge's authority under Rule 166a to grant summary judgment when no…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by272 opinions
- Mark Silguero and Amy Wolfe v. Csl Plasma, IncorporatedTexas Supreme Court · 2019
- Maldonado v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Brown v. ArensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Kilgore Independent School District v. Darlene Axberg, John Claude Axberg, Sheila Anderson, and the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2019
- AEP Texas Inc. v. Wilks Ranch Texas, LTD; Daniel H. Wilks; Staci Wilks; And Farjo Ranch LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2025
267 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.