Legal Opinion
Pickle v. Muse
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1890PublishedCited by 22 opinions
PROM BEDEORD. Appeal from Chancery Court of Bedford County. W. B. BeardeN, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtLurtoN, J.
Tbis is a bill in equity to recover the sum of $600, which complainant charges is due to him from either the People’s National Bank or John T. Muse, both of whom are made defendants. The bill, in substance, alleges that Muse, being indebted to complainant in the sum of $600, claims, on March 26, 1887, to have paid the debt in a check drawn by himself against his account with the defendant. bank, payable to complainant, or his order, and that the check has been paid by the bank and charged up against his account. The defendant bank claims that the check was presented to it for payment by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- &198tna National Bank v. . Fourth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Graves v. . the American Exchange BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Carr v. National Security BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Fort Worth Nat. BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Bell-Wayland Co. v. Bank of SugdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Crisp v. State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- State Bank of Chicago v. Mid-City Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Litchfield Shuttle Co. v. Cumberland Valley Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.