Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Fort Worth Nat. Bank
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRITZ, Judge.
The facts of this case are undisputed; only law questions being presented.
Phillip G. Wade was an employee of Toledo Scale Company. Wade came into possession of certain checks belonging and payable to the scale company. He had no authority to indorse such checks, or to do anything with them except send them to the scale company, and the scale company had never done anything to lead any one to believe to the contrary. Some of these checks were drawn on Fort Worth National Bank, and some on other banks. Wade took all such checks to the Fort Worth National Bank, and after indorsing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- House v. Kountze Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Pickle v. MuseTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Cotter, Truelove & Co. v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- First Nat. Bank of Winnsboro v. First Nat. Bank of QuitmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Coastal Agricultural Supply, Inc. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Home Indemnity Co. v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Union Circulation Co. v. Trust Co. BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Peerless Insurance Company, and North American Systems, Inc. v. Texas Commerce Bank--New Braunfels, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.