Legal Opinion

Smith v. Day

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon

Decided March 23, 1898No. 2,307PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was an action at law by Henry Smith against J. G. & I. N. Day and the Dalles, Portland & Astoria Navigation Company to recover damages for personal injuries. The jury returned a verdict for defendants, and the plaintiff now moves for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

BELLINGER, District Judge.

This is an action for damages resulting from an injury received by the plaintiff under the following circumstances: The plaintiff was a passenger on hoard the navigation company’s boat, from the Dalles to Portland. At the Cascade Locks the defendants J. G. & I. N. Day were engaged, as contractors for the government, in making rock excavations for the locks then in course of construction at that point. Their work was being carried on within what is known as the “Government Reserve,” being lands reservéd by the government for the purposes of the work under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hay v. . the Cohoes CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  2. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. St. Peter v. . DenisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Wright v. ComptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Beauchamp v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  2. Mutual Telephone Co. v. Hawaiian Contracting Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Smith v. DayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1905
  4. Smith v. DayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1902
  5. The William J. LipsettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API