Legal Opinion

Mutual Telephone Co. v. Hawaiian Contracting Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1930No. 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PARSONS, J.

This is an action in trespass wherein the verdict ivas for the plaintiff in the sum of $2500. The case is before us on defendant’s bill of twenty-seven exceptions, ten of which are to the giving of instructions numbered 4, 6, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 19, requested by the plaintiff, sixteen of which are to the refusal to grant instructions numbered 4, 5, 6, 10, 13, 14, 17, 20, 21, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30 and 31, requested by the defendant, and the remaining one of which is to the verdict as being contrary to the law and to the evidence. Plaintiff’s amended…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ford v. FordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Scranton Gas & Water Co. v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Kinsman v. Barton CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Denny's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  5. Lester v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beckstrom v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Atahan v. MuramotoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Beckstrom v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API