Legal Opinion
State v. Sweet
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 23, 2008No. A-1/38 September Term 2007PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto
In these separate appeals from convictions for driving while we have consolidated for purposes of this are asked to address a common issue: whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, U.S. Const. amend. VI, and the New Jersey Constitution, N.J. Const. art. I, ¶ 10, bar the introduction into evidence of foundational documents concerning the operational status of a Breathalyzer®, a device used to measure a subject’s blood alcohol content. 1
We conclude that the ampoule testing certificates at issue in State v. Sweet and the breath testing instrument inspection certificates at issue…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. ChunSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- State v. LongSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. Julie KuropchakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- State v. Julie L. Michaels (072106)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- Konop v. RosenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Janice J. Prioleau v. Kentucky Fried Chicken, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- New Century Financial Services Inc. v. OughlaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.