Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Farmer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 2011No. 83960-3PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶1 This case involves a trial court’s method of valuing stock options in a dissolution proceeding. After separating, Daniel and Teresa Farmer entered into a stipulated agreement dividing their community assets, including several thousand stock options Daniel1 had received from his employer during the marriage. Under the terms of the agreement, Teresa could decide when to exercise her share of the stock options. Before entry of the decree of dissolution, however, Daniel fraudulently exercised all of the options. The trial court was unaware of this when it awarded Teresa half of the community…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In re the Marriage of RideoutWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Mark Scully v. Us Wats, Inc. Kevin O'hare, Individually and in His Capacity as President of Us Wats Aaron Brown, Individually and in His Capacity as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Us Wats Stephen Parker, Individually and in His Capacity as Executive Vice-President of Us WatsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. Wilder v. WilderWashington Supreme Court · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LarsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Cook v. BratengCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. In re the Domestic Partnership of WalshCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Farmer v. FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Moore v. Washington State Health Care AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API