Legal Opinion

Citizens United Reciprocal Exchange v. Perez

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 13, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

HAYDEN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Citizens United Reciprocal Exchange (CURE) filed a civil complaint seeking a declaration that an automobile insurance *529policy it issued based on a fraudulent application was void from its inception and that it had no financial obligation under the policy. The trial judge affirmed the voiding of the policy but found that, for purposes of innocent third parties, the voided policy should be reformed to the mandatory minimum liability insurance coverage under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 of $15,000 per person and $30,000 per occurrence. CURE…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Amiano v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Klumb v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF MANALAPAN-ENGLISHTOWN REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DIST., MONMOUTH COUNTYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  5. Fisher v. New Jersey Auto. Full Ins. Underwriting Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Citizens United Reciprocal Exchange v. PerezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  2. Thomas Demarco v. Sean Robert Stoddard, D.P.m(073949)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  3. Thomas Demarco v. Sean Robert Stoddard, D.P.m(073949)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API