Legal Opinion

Wade v. National Bank of Commerce

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 21, 1919No. 21,474PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action in replevin in the district court lor Martin county to recover possession of a promissory note or for $1,425.60 its value. The case was tried before Dean, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Action in replevin for the possession of a promissory note. Verdict for plaintiff and defendant appeals from the order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

On June 26, 1917, F. E. Wade delivered his promissory note, payable to the order of C. D. Buckpitt, to the payee. The note was for $1,-425.60, due in 90 days from the date mentioned. It is undisputed that the note represents the amount of the premium for a life insurance policy then delivered to Wade, and that, as part of the transaction, Buckpitt made and delivered to Wade this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shelling State Bank v. ClasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Smith v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Mendenhall v. UlrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Gillespie v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. McWethy v. NorbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Silliman v. DobnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. In Re Guardianship of KowalkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Bjornstad v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Veigel v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. City of International Falls v. American Traction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API