Legal Opinion

City of International Falls v. American Traction Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 23, 1923No. 23,896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

' The city of International Falls obtained from the supreme court an order directing the district court for Hennepin county, Hon. W. C. Leary, J. and another, to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not' issue directing the officers above named to transfer the files and papers in the case of City of International Falls v. American Traction Company and others, from the district court for Hennepin county to the district court for Koochiching county.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee O'ueiam.

Original proceeding in mandamus to compel the remanding of an action wherein relator, a municipal corporation, was plaintiff and certain residents of Hennepin county were defendants. The case was commenced in Koochiching county. Within the time and in the manner provided by statute, defendants had the venue changed to Hennepin county. Certain proceedings were had there,' plaintiff, the relator here, participating. The principal step was taken by relator itself in that it noticed the case for trial in Hennepin county.

Thereafter it moved to have the case remanded to Koochiching…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wade v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Delasca v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. State ex rel. Johnson v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Standslast v. ReidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Albrecht v. SellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Solum v. Farmers & Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Scaife Company v. DornackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API