Legal Opinion
Nghiem v. Agha
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 12, 2006No. 04-16749; BAP No. NC-03-01284-PBAPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Peter P. Nghiem appeals pro se two orders of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) awarding appellees GMAC Mortgage Corporation and Executive Trustee Services, Inc. attorney’s fees and costs for litigation before the bankruptcy court and the BAP. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) and “will not disturb a bankruptcy court’s attorney fee determination unless the bankruptcy court abused its discretion or erroneously applied the law.” Ford v. Baroff (In re Baroff), 105 F.3d 439, 441 (9th Cir.1997). We affirm.
To the extent that Nghiem advances contentions concerning the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ford v. Baroff (In re Baroff)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Lerner v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- The 3250 Wilshire Boulevard Building the 3250 Wilshire Partners v. W.R. Grace & Company Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Johnson v. SiegelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Nghiem v. GhazviniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002