Legal Opinion

The 3250 Wilshire Boulevard Building the 3250 Wilshire Partners v. W.R. Grace & Company Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1993No. 91-55998PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

Appellants, the 3250 Wilshire Building and the 3250 Wilshire Partners (collectively “Wilshire”), appeal the district court’s award of approximately $1.2 million in attorney’s fees and expenses to appellee Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Met-Life”). MetLife incurred these expenses in defense of Wilshire’s unsuccessful diversity lawsuit for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, and fraudulent concealment under California law. The district court concluded that the attorney’s fees were recoverable by MetLife under a Purchase…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Lerner v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. 3250 Wilshire Boulevard Building, 3250 Wilshire Partners v. W.R. Grace & Company, Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Caufield v. CanteleSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Victoria Ryan v. Editions Limited West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Baldwin v. Home Savings of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Moallem v. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Kelly v. TworogerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API