Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Siegel

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 2000No. H020624, H020921PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WUNDERLICH, J.

C. Stephen Johnson’s new home flooded during a rainstorm, he filed an action against the sellers of the home, alleging that they had intentionally and negligently failed to disclose flooding and drainage problems on the property. The sellers moved for summary judgment on the ground that Johnson had filed suit without initiating arbitration, as required by the parties’ residential purchase agreement. The trial court granted the sellers’ motion, judgment was entered, and this appeal followed. For reasons we shall explain, we affirm the granting of summary judgment. However,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hoover v. American Income Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Frei v. DaveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Leamon v. KrajkiewczCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Kalai v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API