Legal Opinion

GARTH, VICTORIA G. v. ASSESSORS OF TOWN OF PERINTON

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 2011No. CA 11-00004Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 910 CA 11-00004 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF VICTORIA G. GARTH AND LEONID G. GARTH, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ASSESSORS OF TOWN OF PERINTON, TOWN OF PERINTON BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW AND TOWN OF PERINTON, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. DIBBLE & MILLER, P.C., ROCHESTER (G. MICHAEL MILLER OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS. HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, ROCHESTER (JAMES S. GROSSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. Appeal from a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Montgomery v. Board of Assessment ReviewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Brimberg v. Commissioner of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Katz v. AssessorNew York Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API