Legal Opinion
Brimberg v. Commissioner of Finance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 29, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered March 17, 2006, which granted respondents’ motion *507to dismiss the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, seeking a declaration that the methodology used by respondents to assess petitioner’s property and that of others similarly situated was invalid and unconstitutional and that the 2003/2004 tax rolls for class one properties should be declared void, and which denied petitioner’s cross motion for a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Emunim v. Town of FallsburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Board of Managers of Greens of North Hills Condominium v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Averbach v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Cassos v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garth v. Assessors of PerintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Kuza v. New York City Dept. of Fin.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Brimberg v. Commissioner of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- GARTH, VICTORIA G. v. ASSESSORS OF TOWN OF PERINTONAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011