Legal Opinion
Dadbod Apparel LLC v. Hildawn Design LLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 30, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00188Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DADBOD APPAREL LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00188 DJC AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 HILDAWN DESIGN LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Dadbod Apparel LLC (“Dadbod”) brings the present suit alleging that 18 Defendants Hildawn Design LLC (“Hildawn”) and Hilary D. Wertin misused trademarks 19 to interfere with Plaintiff’s sale of various goods. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants 20 utilized their ownership of the “GIRLDAD” trademark to initiate takedown actions 21 against several of Plaintiff’s products on…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.