Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Clanton v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to relator’s argument that he was improperly deprived of his right to counsel at his preliminary parole revocation hearing. There is no statutory right to counsel at such hearings, and there is nothing in the record to suggest that this is one of the small minority of cases in which “fundamental fairness — the touchstone of due process — will compel the assistance of counsel” (People ex rel. Calloway v Skinner, 33 NY2d 23, 31; see People ex rel. Wildes v New York State Bd. of Parole, 62 AD2d 1006, app dsmd 45 NY2d 961). (Appeal from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Calloway v. SkinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. People ex rel. Wildes v. New York State Board of ParoleNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People ex rel. Wildes v. New York State BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Emmick v. EndersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. People ex rel. Wagner v. TravisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People ex rel. Stewart v. ForemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API