Emmick v. Enders
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: The respondent Parole Board did not violate any statutory right of the petitioner, nor did it fail to provide petitioner due process of law. Respondent “afforded” petitioner a preliminary parole revocation hearing “[w]ithin 15 days after the warrant for retaking and temporary detention has been executed” (Executive Law, § 259-i, subd 3, par [c], cl [i]). Adjournments thereafter were granted at petitioner’s request and pursuant to the hearing officer’s authority (9 NYCRR 8005.4 [b] [3]; see People ex rel. Clanton v Smith, 105 AD2d 1123). When the hearing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People ex rel. Calloway v. SkinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- People ex rel. McGee v. WaltersNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People ex rel. Burley v. WardenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- People ex rel. Delrow v. New York State Division of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Moreland v. BahouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People ex rel. Melendez v. WardenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People ex rel. Morant v. WardenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People ex rel. Smith v. MeloniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People ex rel. Moore v. Warden of Rikers Island Correctional FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People ex rel. Chesner v. WardenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.