Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Calloway v. Skinner

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1973PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJasen, J.

In each of the cases before us1, we are called upon to consider for the first time whether a parolee has a due process right to the assistance of counsel at a preliminary parole revocation hearing.

The Supreme Court recently addressed itself to this issue with respect to indigent probationers and parolees, holding that due process does not invariably require the assistance of counsel at a preliminary or a final revocation hearing. (Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U. S. 778.) The holding in Gagnon {supra) is, in part at least, at variance with our recent decision in People ex rel. Menechino v. Warden…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People Ex Rel. Shapiro v. Keeper of City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. People v. WirtschafterNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. People v. DylaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. McDermottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Raymond Argro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. People ex rel. Newcomb v. MetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API