Legal Opinion
Polk v. Denver District Court
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 22, 1993No. 92SA330PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
In this original proceeding brought pursuant to C.A.R. 21, the petitioner Charles R. Polk seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to permit him to amend his answer to add counterclaims. We issued a rule to show cause and now discharge that rule.
I
In 1984, Polk, an executive vice-president of the Writer Corporation, took out a personal loan with United Bank of Denver and signed a promissory note for $350,000, with repayment beginning in June 1987. Polk secured the loan with some of his Writer Corporation common stock, then valued at twice the amount of the loan balance, and he gave…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In the Interest of ClintonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- McCall v. District Court for the Twenty-First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- H. W. Houston Construction Co. v. District Court of the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Eagle River Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. District Court Ex Rel. County of EagleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. District Court in & for Weld CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Reigel v. SavaSeniorCare L.L.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Vinton v. VirziSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Ajay Sports, Inc. v. CasazzaColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Town of Carbondale v. GSS PROPERTIES, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.