Legal Opinion

Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. And Guidant Sales Corporation v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc. And Boston Scientific Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 6, 2001No. 00-1454PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. and Guidant Sales Corp. (collectively, “ACS”) appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana granting summary judgment in favor of Scimed Life Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation (collectively, “Scimed”) in ACS’s suit against Scimed for patent infringement. Adv. Cardiovascular Sys., Inc. v. Scimed Life Sys., Inc., No. 98-1108 (S.D. Ind. June 28, 2000) (“Adv. Cardiovascular TV”). The district court ruled that Scimed was entitled to summary judgment that it did not infringe the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
Warner-Lambert Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
Serio-US Industries, Inc. v. Plastic Recovery Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
Cordis Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
Microsoft Corporation v. Geotag, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.