Legal Opinion
Microsoft Corporation v. Geotag, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 1, 2016No. 2015-1140PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACH, Circuit Judge.
Appellant GeoTag, Inc. (“GeoTag”) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (“District Court”) finding that it had subject matter jurisdiction over (1) Appellee Google Inc.’s (“Google”) First Amended Complaint,, which, sought a declaratory judgment that U.S. Patent No. 5,930,474 (“the '474 patent”) (J.A 89-133) is invalid and not infringed by Google; and (2) Geo-Tag’s counterclaims, which alleged that Google infringed the 474 patent. See Microsoft Corp. v. GeoTag, Inc., No. 11-175-RGA, 2014 WL 4312167 (D.Del. Aug. 29, 2014).…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Communications Test Design v. Contec, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Dorman Products, Inc. v. Paccar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Argonaut Ins. Co. v. St. Francis Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Intellisoft, Ltd. v. Acer America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.