Stephens v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction of accessory after the fact to the commission of a burglary, in violation of § 6-5-202, W.S.1977 (June 1983 Replacement). The issues raised by appellant are whether or not there was sufficient evidence of the element of “rendering assistance” and of the element of “intent” to sustain the conviction. We hold that there was not sufficient evidence of either element, and reverse the conviction.
On December 1, 1985, appellant was at his ex-wife’s residence with Harry Van Bu-rén. Appellant agreed to let Van Burén stay with him that evening…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DutyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Dangel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Tipton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
- United States v. Gladys BissonetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- State v. CliffordOregon Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BudikWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Lewis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Pueblo v. León CortijoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1998
- Tageant v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. RiveraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.