Legal Opinion

Kwatowski v. Runyon

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 5, 1996No. Civil Action 95-30064-MAPPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONSOR, District Judge.

This motion is hereby ALLOWED based upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, which this court has reviewed de novo and which it adopts. The plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies and has failed to make out a prima facie case of retaliation.

So ordered.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF COURT ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 05)

NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General of the United States (hereinafter “the Government”) has moved, pursuant to F.R.Civ.P.…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. OteroDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
  2. Dzanku v. BrennanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  3. Magdalenski v. United States GovernmentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  4. Valdez v. Clayton Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. BAILEY v. DEJOYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API