Legal Opinion
Ross v. Ross
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 3, 1953No. Civ. 4586PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order setting aside an interlocutory decree of divorce, and from an order substituting an attorney for the plaintiff.
The complaint, filed on May 23, 1952, alleged cruelty as the ground for a divorce. On June 4th, the defendant filed an answer and a cross-complaint seeking a divorce on the same ground. On June 26th, the court entered an order requiring the defendant to pay the plaintiff $20 per week for her maintenance. On June 30th, notice that trial of the cause was set for July 30th was served on plaintiff’s attorney.
The cause was called on July 30th, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crescent Canal Co. v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Svistunoff v. SvistunoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- McMahon v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Starkweather v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Linsk v. LinskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Beaida v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Duffy v. Griffith Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Harness v. Pacific Curtainwall Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.