Legal Opinion

Brannon v. Varnado

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1958No. 40903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, P. J.

The appellants contend, by their bill in this cause, that Barney Brannon is the fee simple owner of an undivided one-fourth mineral interest in lands located in Forrest County, Mississippi, described as the Northeast Quarter and the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 5 North, Range 14 West. The bill has attached thereto, as a part thereof, copies of the conveyances affecting the title to said one-fourth mineral interest. Respondents to the bill, George C. Yarnado, Jr., Wallace R. Gunn, and The Humble Oil & Refining Company, who are the appellees, deny that Brannon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garraway v. BRYANTMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  3. White v. MERCHANTS AND PLANTERS BK.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Merchants & Manufacturers Bank v. DennisMississippi Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bourn v. Tomlinson Interest, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kadrmas v. SauvageauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Rosenbaum v. McCaskeyMississippi Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Cole v. MinorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Searcy v. Tomlinson Interests, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API