Salmen Brick & Lumber Co. v. Williams
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*563Ethridge, C.
This case involves a situation where a grantor, who had property conveyed to it with a one-half mineral exception, subsequently itself conveyed the property, using the same language which was used for the original mineral exception. The question is whether, under the facts to be presently described, the second grantor conveyed exactly what it received, or retained for itself the remaining one-half of the minerals.
This case is a consolidation by agreement of counsel of two separate appeals from final decrees of the chancery court of Pearl River County, Mississippi, adjudicating the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
- Klein v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Long-Bell Petroleum Co. v. TriticoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Klein v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Richardson v. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pfisterer v. NobleMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
- Andrew H. Howard and Mrs. Inez Howard v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Hurst v. Southwest Miss. Legal Services Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Thornhill v. System Fuels, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Rogers v. MorganMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.