United States v. Dyson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
A police-dog alert on a parked car ultimately led to evidence used to convict Rodney Dyson of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). A motion to suppress the evidence was properly denied because the dog sniff did not violate the Fourth Amendment. First, because the car was not stopped by the police, there was no protected Fourth Amendment interest in not having the car sniffed. Second, in any event, reasonable suspicion supported the sniff. Affirmance of Dyson’s conviction and sentence is therefore required, as none of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lane v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Keith Rudolph Ludwig, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Jaime Perez (04-5440) Walter Rhodes (05-5373)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. WeaverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State of Texas v. Weaver, Roy AndrewCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State of Texas v. Weaver, Roy AndrewCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State v. WeaverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- United States v. Ahmad JebrilCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015