Legal Opinion
United States v. Jaime Perez (04-5440) Walter Rhodes (05-5373)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 14, 2006No. 04-5440, 05-5373PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Defendants Jaime Perez and Walter Rhodes both appeal from the district court’s denial of their respective motions to suppress evidence. They challenge the stop of the Cadillac Escalade EXT in which they were both traveling, and the search of the unoccupied Chevrolet Tahoe from which 30 kilograms of cocaine were seized. Defendants each challenge the legality of the stop, the scope and length of their detention, and the search of the Tahoe. After review of the record and the arguments presented on appeal, we affirm.
I
Rhodes and Perez were charged, along with…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- James W. Smoak v. Eric Hall, David Bush Jeff Phann Tim McHood Brian Brock Jerry Andrews, LieutenantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Brittany Harris v. Kimberly KlareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Dorsey v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- State v. WeaverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.