Legal Opinion

United States v. Keith Rudolph Ludwig, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Amicus Curiae

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1994No. 93-2084PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals the denial of its motion to reconsider the district court’s suppression order. The government argues that the challenged dog sniff of Keith Ludwig’s car was not a search under the Fourth Amendment, and that no warrant was required to search the car after the dog alerted. We agree and reverse.

BACKGROUND

At about 11:15 p.m. on December 12, 1992, Joel Nickles, a Border Patrol agent at the permanent checkpoint near Truth or Consequences, New Mexico, walked a trained narcotics dog through the parking lot of the nearby Super 8 Motel to see…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. United States v. Anthony E. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Keiran George KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. James Buchanon (94-3551), William Reed, Jr. (94-3660)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. State v. WiegandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API