Legal Opinion

Jacoby v. Hollada

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1914No. 10709PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered May 25, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, C. J.

Action on a promissory note, by Joseph R. H. Jacoby against A. G. Hollada and Jane Doe Hollada, his wife. From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, the defendants have appealed.

Respondent has moved this court to dismiss the appeal for the reasons that appellant Jane Doe Hollada failed to execute any appeal bond as required by statute; that she appeared and filed an answer, and that no notice of appeal was served on her by her codefendant. The condition of the bond shows that it was executed on behalf of both defendants. The notice of appeal was given for both defendants. The bond was signed for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murray v. TolmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Pinch v. HotalingMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Gerlach v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Chapman v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Patton v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Westby v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Boehme v. Broadway Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Westby v. GorsuchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. J. C. Miller Estate, Inc. v. DruryWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API