Legal Opinion

State v. Cushman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 9, 1970No. 54660PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

This is an appeal by William Bradford Cushman from the judgment of the circuit court affirming a judgment of conviction in the magistrate court and a sentence to pay a $5 fine for violation of § 302.020, subd. 3, V.A.M.S., which requires that every person operating or riding as a passenger on any motorcycle upon any highway of this state wear protective headgear at all times and provides that “The protective headgear shall meet reasonable standards and specifications established by the director” of revenue. The constitutionality of paragraph 3 of § 302.020 was challenged…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Everhardt v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. Colvin v. LombardiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  3. City of Springfield v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Marshall v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. State Ex Inf. Atty. Gen. v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Robotham Ex Rel. Robotham v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ross v. Kansas City General Hospital & Medical CenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Benning v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. People v. KohrigIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Buhl v. HanniganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API