Legal Opinion

DirecTV, Inc. v. Karpinsky

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 31, 2003No. 2:02-cv-73929PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, VACATING ENTRY OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER, AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S JULY 23, 2003 MOTION FOR COSTS AS MOOT

STEEH, District Judge.

Plaintiff DirecTV moves for reconsideration of this court’s June 17, 2003 Opinion and Order to the extent defendant Eugene Karpinsky was granted summary judgment as to DirecTV’s claims that Karpin-sky received and assisted others in receiving unauthorized programming in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 605(a) (Count I), intentionally intercepted, endeavored…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Beverly Huff v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Elizabeth HuffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. Nagle Industries, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  4. Wilson v. Stroh Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. DIRECTV, Inc. v. RobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Direct TV, Inc. v. TreworgyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. DirecTV, Inc. v. Karpinsky (In Re Karpinsky)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
  4. Directv, Inc. v. BarnesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
  5. Directv, Inc. v. GuzziDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API