Legal Opinion
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. United States
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 27, 1996No. 2:94-CV-262PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEAGUE, District Judge.
On February 5,1996, the Court entered an opinion and order awarding summary judgment and declaratory judgment to the plaintiff. 914 F.Supp. 1496. In essence, the Court’s opinion concluded that the class III gaming conducted by the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community (the “Tribe”) was authorized by the Tribal-State Compact between the Tribe and the State of Michigan, and therefore lawful. Defendants United States of America, U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Department of Justice (collectively the “federal defendants”) have filed a motion for reconsideration or, in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Beverly Huff v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Elizabeth HuffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States ex rel. American Textile Manufacturers Institute Inc. v. Limited, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
- DirecTV, Inc. v. KarpinskyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Mescalero Apache v. State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Kenneth Henes Special Projects Procurement v. Continental Biomass Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
- Nagle Industries, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.