Legal Opinion
United States v. Frank Suppa
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 27, 1986No. 86-5481PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
Introduction
Frank Suppa appeals from the order of the district court directing his pretrial detention. Two questions are presented. First, is an indictment for one of the crimes enumerated in the Bail Reform Act of 1984 sufficient to support a judicial finding of probable cause which triggers the rebut-table presumption of dangerousness under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)? Second, if the rebut-table presumption of dangerousness was triggered, did Suppa fail to rebut the presumption? Because we answer both questions affirmatively, we affirm the district…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Robert P. DelkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Antonio Jose Hurtado, Mark Anthony Olson, Diego Alonzo Flores-Soto, Hector Albert Rua and Jose Pita AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Howard Perry, Glen Hagen, James Geran, Kevin Dorr. United States of America v. Howard Perry and Gary MooreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Antonio Dominguez and Roberto RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Kaley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. Gerald SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- United States v. William LusterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- State v. Amed Ingram (079079) (Camden and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- United States v. KerrDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.