Legal Opinion

State v. Amed Ingram (079079) (Camden and Statewide)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 1, 2017No. A-56-16PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rabner

Under the Criminal Justice Reform Act (CJRA), which went into effect on January 1, 2017, prosecutors can seek to detain defendants who pose a serious risk of danger, flight, or obstruction. N.J.S.A. 2A:16 2-18(a)(1). In this appeal, we consider the manner in which the State may present its proofs when it moves for detention.

Before the trial court in this case, the State proffered various documents about the offense and defendant’s criminal history in support of an application for detention. Defendant asserted that the State was required to call a live witness with firsthand knowledge of the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. S.N.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  2. State v. PinkstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  3. State ex rel. Torrez v. WhitakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State ex rel. Torrez v. WhitakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. DickersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API