Legal Opinion

Fifer v. Ritter

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1902No. 19,836PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From Fulton Circuit Court; A. C. Capron, Judge. Proceedings by Daniel W. Ritter and others to open highway, wherein William Fifer files remonstrance for damages. From a judgment for petitioners, remonstrant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

— Appellees filed before the board of commissioners of Marshall county their petition for a public highway, and afterwards, upon a favorable report of the view*10ers, appellant filed his remonstrance for damages. The reviewers awarded him a small amount, from which award he appealed t'o the circuit court, where the verdict of the jury was against him. A new trial was granted him, whereupon the venue was changed to the Eulton Circuit Court. In the latter court the jury also returned a verdict adverse to appellant.

Some attempt has been made to bring before us the sufficiency of the report of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Newport v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Unruh v. State ex rel. BaumIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Woollen v. WhitacreIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Trittipo v. BeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Strebin v. LavengoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co. v. JesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Glendenning v. StahleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Welty v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Bader v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API