Legal Opinion

Young v. Melrose Granite Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1922No. 22,812PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Certiorari to review a judgment awarded plaintiff under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Plaintiff is a stone cutter, having worked many years in the granite shops at St. Cloud. On August 9, 1920, he worked for defendant, and two hours the next morning. He then quit, and at one o’clock the same day started to work for another firm where he continued until December 18, 1920. In February, 1921, he demanded compensation for injuries. When it was refused the complaint herein was filed, wherein the claim is made that the machine at which he was set to work, on the dates mentioned, was so defective…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. La Veck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Brown's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Johansen v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Niessen v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. American Maize Products Co. v. NichiporchikIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API