Magraw v. Dillow
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
KARWACKI, Judge.
We are presented here with the question of the scope and application of the special covenant against encumbrances, which is described in Maryland Code (1974, 1988 Repl.Vol.), § 2-110 of the Real Property Article. Because the Court of Special Appeals properly construed the covenant under the circumstances of the instant ease, we shall affirm.
I
At issue are four adjoining properties that together comprise 5.09 acres of land located in Cecil County. Prior to 1988, James S. Magraw (James) owned an undivided % interest in those unimproved properties. The outstanding Jé interest was…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- City of Beaumont v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Huyck v. . AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Brashears v. CollisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- McKenrick v. Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mayor & Cncl. of Balt. v. Thornton MellonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Midfirst Bank v. AbneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Kona Properties, LLC v. W.D.B. Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Gebhardt Family Investment, L.L.C. v. Nations Title Insurance of New York, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Ochse v. HenryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.