Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rawlings' Administrator

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 15, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to judgment of circuit court of Amherst county,, rendered April 12tS, 1884, at the trial of an issue wherein H. E. Smith was plaintiff and George H. Damerori was defendant. Verdict was for defendant. Plaintiff’s motion for new trial was overruled, and he excepted. Judgment being entered on the verdict, plaintiff obtained a writ of error and supersedeas. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHinton, J.

It appears by the record in this case that in April, 1878„ *675William H. Mosby, administrator of J. H. Rawlings, late sheriff of Amherst county, suing for the benefit of George H. Dameron, recovered a judgment against John T. Edwards and A. W. Williams for the sum of $15,000, the penalty of the bond, to be discharged by the payment of $2,786.10, with interest from the twenty-third September, 1873, and the costs of suit, subject to a credit of $620.25 as of June 27,1875. An execution was issued upon this judgment and levied on certain personal property as being owned by the said A. W. Williams,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lake v. LakeWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. EasthamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Sluman v. DolanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Stoneman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874
  5. Stoneman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API