Legal Opinion
Weinberg v. Whitebone
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 1948No. Civ. 13780PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This appeal involves the statutory provision (Veh. Code, § 402) necessary to relieve a person from civil liability as “owner” of a vehicle at the time of an accident, and Vehicle Code, sections 186, 177 and 178, which relate to or modify section 402.
The judgment is based upon two verdicts, one for the sum of $6,000 in favor of plaintiff Philip Weinberg, and the other in the sum of $1,250 in favor of plaintiff Clare Weinberg. The defendants are Cecil A. Whitebone and Selma S. White-bone, individually, and as copartners doing business as Midtown Motor Sales Company, and Midtown Motor Sales…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Krum v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Ferroni v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Dennis v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Piacun v. HexemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Wargin v. WarginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Stoddart v. PeirceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Rosenthal v. Harris Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Bardin v. CaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Enis v. Specialty Auto SalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.