Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 18, 1928No. 18287PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRile'Y, J.
Robert E. Jackson, as plaintiff below, brought this action on contract against the board of county commissioners of Muskogee county, and alleged that as an attorney he had represented the said board in certain tax matter’s pending in the federal court, wherein a recovery of delinquent taxes was' secured in the sum of $21,-905.45, for the benefit of said board, and that, as provided by said contract and agreement, plaintiff’s compensation was to be contingent and reasonable; that 15 per cent, of the amount of recovery was reasonable, for which amount plaintiff sued. Particularizing as to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Town of AftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Tulsa v. Tulsa Camera RecordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Butler v. Board of Com'rs of Delaware CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Board of Com'rs v. News-Dispatch Ptg. & Audit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Jackson Materials Co. v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Western Paint & Chemical Co. v. Board of County Com'rs of Kingfisher CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Simmons v. Board of County Com'rs of Osage CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936