Legal Opinion
Barkdull v. Homestake Mining Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 26, 1987No. 15416PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by Thomas Barkdull from an order of the trial court affirming the Department of Labor’s denial of his claim for rehabilitation benefits. We affirm.
FACTS
Barkdull was injured on July 14, 1976, while working for Homestake Mining Company. Following a lengthy legal battle, this court upheld an award of worker’s compensation benefits to Barkdull. See Barkdull v. Homestake Mining Co., 317 N.W.2d 417 (S.D.1982).
As a result of the injury, Barkdull was unable to return to his occupation as a “miner;” however, at the time of his injury in 1976, he was a welder for Homestake. So in June…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Ex Parte Beaver Valley Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Barkdull v. Homestake Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Lee v. South Dakota Department of HealthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Salem v. ColegroveSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Hanson v. Penrod Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Cozine v. Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Grievance of Beville v. University of South Dakota/South Dakota Board of RegentsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Smith v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.