Legal Opinion

City of Salem v. Colegrove

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided October 12, 1984No. Record 831322PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

This workers’ compensation appeal raises the question whether the “reasonable and necessary vocational rehabilitation training services” provided for by Code § 65.1-88 * include a four-year college course.

Haskel W. Colegrove, the claimant, suffered a serious compensable back injury in 1978 while working as a laborer on a refuse-collecting truck for the City of Salem. The City’s insurance carrier paid for extensive medical treatment, including a spinal fusion. In July 1979, Dr. Robert A. Pruner, a physician chosen by the carrier, examined the claimant with respect to his fitness for selective…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. T v. TSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  2. Stuart Circle Hospital v. AldersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Low Splint Coal Co., Inc. v. BollingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  4. Peanut City Iron & Metal Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  5. Lancaster v. Cooper IndustriesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Beaver Valley Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Cibula v. Allied Fibers & PlasticsCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  3. Barkdull v. Homestake Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Lynchburg Foundry Co. v. GoadCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  5. Smith v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API